Skip to content

on the formation and support of think tanks

At an event on intermediaries today I was asked about the incentives that may drive parliamentarians to demand research based evidence -and how would one go about finding out.

I’ll deal with this later, but in the meantime, here is an interesting theory on the origin of think tanks -that is linked to this question. According to Anthony Bertelli and Jeffrey Wenger, in attempting to explain the recent growth in the formation of think tanks in the United States:

committee debate creates incentives for legislators to seek research-based, policy-analytic information supporting competing policy positions. As political entrepreneurs recognize this demand, they supply think tanks, just as scholars have suggested they supply interest groups. An important macro-level implication of this theory is that as legislators’ ideological polarization increases, the demand for policy analysis increases, as does the number of think tanks supplied.

It is worth considering the push factor provided by the political entrepreneurs described by Matt Bai in his book, The Argument,  but this theory of think tank formation is interesting. Bertelli and Wenger offer research funders eager to ensure sustainability and value for money for their investments an attractive entry point. To promote the supply of research, funders could attempt to strengthen the demand.

This demand side approach would involve a number of options: support to political parties, strengthening (and in some cases creating new) parliamentary and evidence based policy making processes,  developing of a highly sophisticated intellectual and investigative media elite capable of challenging public policy debates, etc.

None of these are simple interventions but they, unlike the current supply side alternatives, more likely to promote the development of a sustainable market of ideas -fuelled by a hungrier and more discerning domestic user audience.

There is a fundamental problem in the current approach where funding decisions are still made by donors in western cities with little or no regard for the absorptive capacity of research communities in developing countries (and which terribly distort the research market and the labour market for experts in the poorest countries -but this is for another day). Hundreds of thousands of dollars (if not millions) are channeled directly from western donors or indirectly through western think tanks (and increasingly consultancies) acting as business development agents for souther researchers and research centres.

What incentive then do they have then to respond to policymakers’ needs and demands (if and when they are expressed)? None. A Ugandan participant at the intermediaries event, who works for the Ugandan Parliament’s parliamentary research service (which has a parliamentary research service and so is already part of the way along the road development road I am suggesting), was complaining that even when parliamentary committees publish calls for evidence in national newspapers hardly any researcher comes forward. But Why would they?   Their audiences, quite clearly, are the western researchers and policymakers who fund them.

A domestically managed and resourced fund which competitively allocated research contracts (like ESRC in the United Kingdom or CIES in Peru) would quickly shift the attention of researchers from foreign to domestic audiences. Researchers would quickly realise that they must engage in domestic policy debates or perish.

About these ads
3 Comments Post a comment
  1. I have been looking at alternative definition as well as trying to define the functions think tanks assume in Central and Eastern Europe.

    In one of your earlier posts you quote Tom Medvetz and his paper. While, I agree with his approach in defining think tanks as a proto-field, I believe in CEE, they are not there yet.

    On the definitions and the context in which think tanks work in CEE, i tried to link them to two well-known theories and one upcoming concept. Check out the elaboration on my personal blog:

    http://goranspolicy.com/theoretical-underpinnings-think-tanks-cee/

    On the functions, look at the continuum I tried to develop based on a survey of 96 think tanks in the region (still unpublished):
    http://goranspolicy.com/tt-survey/
    The grid is presented in the attached file

    December 3, 2010
    • Thanks for this comment Goran -and your great insights into think tanks in CEE (from your blog -I’ve added it to my blogroll, by the way).

      On the first point, I guess I would say that I don’t think Medvetz defines a think tank (and neither do I) but rather attempts to describe the space in which it may exist. Then I would say that if what matters are the functions (we have different views of functions…) then there may be organisations that we may not recognise as ‘think tank’s -or may have already other names: Media, Parties, NGOS, Universities- that fulfil those functions or roles.

      On functions then -I still need to review your docs in more detail so I promise a comment on your blog- I think I am being a lot more general (but there is some overlap). My functions are less specific than yours: policy influence/informing, spaces for debate, development of new generations of policymakers, legitimate or audit policies and narratives, channel funds and resources. Of course not all functions need to be carried out for an organisation to ‘qualify’ as a think tank, but I guess that it is safe to say that at least they must attempt to inform/affect/influence (analysis/research/values/ideology-evidence based) change: how they do this is another matter.

      December 4, 2010

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Great resource on think tanks | Goran's musings

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,797 other followers

%d bloggers like this: