Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘Think Tank Initiative’

on think tanks Newsletter N°3

News, events and job announcements from think tanks and donors around the world for think tanks and think tankers.

Read more

on think tanks Newsletter N°1

News, events and job announcements from think tanks and donors around the world for think tanks and think tankers.

Read more

Think tanks and universities: a research project proposal

The Think Tank Initiative has launched a new call for proposals to study the relationship between universities and think tanks. This seems like once in life time opportunity to develop new knowledge on this field. This blog outlines a value for money project design that could maximise the density of information and knowledge on this relationship.

Read more

Think Tank Initiative Policy Engagement and Communications Program, Coordinating Lead(s)

The Think Tank Initiative has just launched a call for expressions of interest to implement its Policy Engagement and Communications Support Program. It offers great opportunities for new relationships to be forged and new ideas to come into this sector.

Read more

Think Tank Initiative 2012 Exchange: How a digital strategy can enhance think tank management, research and communications

These videos are part of the June 19th Workshop A of the Think Tank Initiative Exchange. This workshop was about digital strategy plays a role in think tank management, research and communications.

Read more

Think Tanks and Universities: Practical Considerations

There are synergies between think tanks and universities. This blog draws attention to the more practical side of this symbiotic relationship as well as the significant risks that these linkages can bring, including some opportunities and challenges.

Read more

Think Tank Exchange Sessions: on balancing research and advocacy, and its implications for quality research

This is the fourth set of videos from the TTI Exchange sessions. This panel was about discussing how think tanks balance research with advocacy, and how this impacts the quality of research.

Subrat Das of the Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability

Das stresses that advocacy is important because if think tanks want to achieve results, they must reach out to relevant stakeholders. The quality of research alone will not necessarily attract stakeholder attention. He also mentions that even if think tanks are able to influence the perspective of key stakeholders, they might not be able to influence their sense of urgency. While policy makers may agree on the importance of the problem, they might express their inability to do something about it, which poses a challenge for these organisations.

Mauricio Diaz Burdett of the Foro Social de Deuda Externa y Desarrollo de Honduras (FOSDEH)

Diaz Burdett believes that the importance of doing research is to promote reflection and the adoption of public opinion in decision making. Think tanks such as the one he belongs to, he says, are positioned in such a manner that they are more in contact with every day people, as opposed to the government, and so research serves as a vehicle for these people to bring their concerns to the public agenda. Think tanks’ relationship with the media is also important, and it’s necessary to consider what kind of formats need to be used when conveying research to radio, television, or the press.

Godber Tumushabe of the Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment

Tumushabe suggests that think tanks focus on the demand side of research, mainly the government. It is the government who has to demand quality research that changes public policy. Another issue is where think tanks should draw the boundary between advocacy and activism, something which is solved by framing the purpose of the organisation. He also mentions that advocacy depends largely on context and on the partnership between policy think tanks and policy makers.

Oliver Babson of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 

To Babson, there are different approaches to advocacy that depend on the country’s political context, on the institution itself and the channels that are used to employ said advocacy. For example, some institutions are very close to the government, largely funded by them, or they can be totally independent. Thus these institutions will have different ways of balancing advocacy and research. This also applies to the issues being researched, which will matter more for advocacy to some than to others. Institutions may also work directly or through other organisations. Ultimately, though, Babson believes that the TTIX panel prizes research over advocacy, particularly its quality.

Think Tank Initiative 2012 Exchange: Sustaining quality in social policy research – lessons learned from institutional approaches

This is the third set of videos from the TTI Exchange sessions. This panel was about reviewing the lessons learned from institutional approaches on sustaining quality in social policy research.

First up was Rajeev Bhargava of the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS).

Rajeev points out several factors that help nurture quality research. Some of these are creating a milieu that acknowledges that academics “get it right”: they grasp what is going on and strive for internal goods such as truth and plausibility. However, research also produces external goods, such as power, and think tanks can be lured by these goods, which is why they should not become the aim of research practice. He also emphasizes evidence based research and the importance of pluralism in any good institution.

Watch Rajeev’s talk:

Next was Mahmood Mamdani of the Makerere Institute of Social Research

Mahmood points out that while think tanks’ goal is to generate public debate on issues of public policy, researchers cannot assume that there is a causal relationship between policy makers and researchers. Academics must also not forget that the relationship between think tanks and policy makers stems from the understanding that think tanks are autonomous, and that the public agenda is not defined by the existing scope of public policy.

Watch Mahmood’s talk: 

Sukhadeo Thorat of the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR)

Sukhadeo stresses that sustainable policy demands that all policy suggestions are based on a realistic understanding of the issue at hand. Research is understanding, and policy is action based on understanding. This is why methodology is also an extremely important factor in research. He also states that ideal solutions may not be politically acceptable, so research should always try to offer more than one solution.

Watch Sukhadeo’s talk: 

And finally, Roxana Barrantes of the Instituto de Estudios Peruanos (IEP) 

Roxana first gives an account of the history of research institutions in Latin America, particularly in Peru, to point out that for strong academic contribution to knowledge, you need strong academic leadership. She mentions a couple of well known Latin American intellectuals and their impact on research and policy, and also emphasizes the importance of attracting young talent from universities.

Watch Roxana’s talk: 

Think Tank Initiative 2012 Exchange: on sustaining quality in economic policy research

This is the second set of videos from the TTI exchange sessions. This is on how to make sure that the quality of think tanks research is sustained over time:

Eric Eboh: African Institute for Applied Economics (AIAE)

Watch Eric’s talk

Kamilla Gumede: J-PAL

Watch Kamilla’s talk (interesting description of J-PAL and the role of RCTs; but misses the point of good economic policy, in my view: it has to be both rigorous and ideologically sound -cannot have good policy without good politics)

Fernando Masi: Centro de Análisis y Difusión de la Economía Paraguaya (CADEP)

Watch Fernando’s talk

Mustafizur Rahman: Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD)

Watch Mustafizur’s talk

And the  first part and second part of the discussions.

Think Tank Initiative 2012 exchange: on building research capacity for ‘young’ think tanks

On Monday, Hans Gutbrod from the Think Tank Initiative shared his views on the coming together of think tanks from across the developing world. Over the next few weeks we will be sharing a number of videos from its sessions at the TTI Exchange in Cape Town earlier this year. I was not able to go to all of them so I am glad they are now out to see what went on. From the email sent by Julie Lafrance from TTI to the participants:

In an effort to continue the interaction and learning from the TTI Exchange, we will make 2 panels / workshops available each week for the next six weeks for you to view, or share with colleagues, business associates or friends that were not able to join us for the Exchange.  For ease of viewing, each 2 hour session has been split into 15 minute clips for each presenter and the discussions have been segmented into two parts.

The first session is on how to develop the research capacity of young/new think tanks:

Panel A: Building capacity for quality research – challenges and opportunities for “young” think tanks can be found here. The videos are below:

Ajaya Dixit: Institute for Social and Environmental Transition – Nepal (ISET-N)

Watch Ajaya’s talk (not really about building capacity but and interesting discussion on limitations of external ‘experts’)

Werner Hermani: Fundación ARU

Watch Werner’s talk

Eberechukwu Uneze: Center for the Study of the Economies of Africa

Watch Ebere’s talk

Ibrahima Hathié: Initiative prospective agricole et rurale (IPAR)

Watch Ibrahima’s talk

And the discussions from the floor: the first part and second part

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,406 other followers