Anyone who runs or works for a think tank has had to argue the case in favour of supporting think tanks. We are seen as academics or egg heads who like to talk a lot but don’t follow through. This is reflected in the limited support from corporations and philanthropists available to think tanks in developing countries.
Jeff Judson presents 21 reasons why Think Tanks are more effective than others in changing public policy -and one reason why they are not. I was expecting a comparison between free-market think tanks and ‘other’ think tanks but the focus is more general and the comparison seems to be with other ‘free market’ interest, advocacy or lobby groups. So, without suggesting that his reasons are free from the need for a more nuanced analysis, he provides think tanks with a good argument for rallying the support of potential funders.
- Source of leading ideas
- Have the right skills
- Less expensive
- Have powerful friends
- Earn media better than anyone
- Politicians trust them
- Work harder
- Have national and international influence
- Powerful research
- Stellar reputations
- Impervious to attack
- Long-term allies
- Donors are confidential
- Messaging experts
- Lower overhead
- Singular focus
- Great in coalitions
- Pre-partisan
- Defining the leading edge of communications
- Wining in the courts
- Greatest Rolodex
-and one reason why they are not more influential: they are chronically underfunded.