Think tank

Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law

N/A

Luxembourg City, Luxembourg

A research institution undertaking interdisciplinary and collaborative research in the fields of international, European and regulatory procedural law. It focuses onthe procedures underlying dispute settlement and decision-making processes, with the aim of identifying and analysing emerging trends in dispute resolution mechanisms and decision-making across Europe and beyond.

Contact details

Website:
https://www.mpi.lu/home/

Address:
Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law in Luxembourg, 4,rue Alphonse Weicker, 2721 Luxemburg, Luxemburg

Country:
Luxembourg

Sub-region:
Western Europe

Areas of focus

Topics of research
Geographics of focus
Luxembourg, International
Operating languages
English

Organisation details

Business model
Non-profit
Institutional affiliations
Independent
Year founded
2012
Age (years)
Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law
 11
Luxembourg average
 16
Global average
 32
Founded by
Founders: Burkhard Hess
Founder gender: All male
Leadership
Leader(s) (2022): N/A
Leader gender: N/A
Leader(s) (2021): Prof. Burkhard Hess, Prof. Hélène Ruiz Fabri
Leader gender: Both male and female (more than one person)
Leader(s) (2020): Professor Hélène Ruiz Fabri
Leader gender: Both male and female (more than one person)
Staff size
2021
Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law
 65
Luxembourg average
 183
Global average
 85
2019
Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law
 70
% Female staff
2019
Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law
 60%
Luxembourg average
 59%
Global average
 43%
% Female researchers
2019
Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law
 48%
Luxembourg average
 54%
Global average
 35%

Data notes

Last updated: 08/06/2021
Rating of data accuracy (find out more): Authenticated
Data sources consulted: Organisation´s website
Have we got something wrong? Contact us to update this record. There is more information in the database, you can download it here.