\nProject duration:\u00a0<\/b>2012 \u2013 2013<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nProject length:<\/b>\u00a03 years<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nPartner countries & organisations:\u00a0<\/b>eleven organisations (Germany, Denmark, Norway, Italy, UK, France, Belgium, Ireland, Hungary)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nProject scope:<\/b>\u00a0The aim of the project was to systematize innovation in social services in the European Union, including the selection and filming of some exemplary practices. The Budapest Institute was responsible for the Hungarian cases and the preparation and quality control of the filming process.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nCollaboration \u2013 main experiences and lessons:\u00a0<\/b>The BI participated as a consortium partner. The great asset of the consortium team was that in addition to the representatives of prestigious universities, three umbrella organizations (The European Association of Service Providers for Persons with Disabilities, The European Network on Independent Living, SOLIDAR) were also members of the project team. This guaranteed the infiltration of practical aspects. The BI as the only Central and Eastern European (CEE) partner explicitly aimed at collecting region-specific research evidence and sharing information on ordinary practices from the CEE countries, thereby indicating considerable differences to the Western European situation. Although our consortium partners were part of this division of roles, we often faced misunderstanding from their side and need for more clarification on contextual factors.The main coordinators of the project were well-informed and highly experienced in the co-ordination of such large-scale projects. Although a highly democratic intra-consortium decision-making process was quite time-consuming, decisions could be amended even in the very final stage of consultation process, the outputs were never in delay and the project delivered the planned outcomes.The co-ordination of the filming process required quite extensive communication with the filming team as well as with the consortium members and their local partners. It was challenging to coordinate the discussions, to finalise the conceptual framework for the short films, and to reconcile the often diverging preferences of all the participants.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Case 2: Collaborative project \u2013 Central-Eastern European example: The Price of Your Capital<\/p>\n \n\n\nProject name:<\/b>\u00a0The Price of Your Capital (PoYC)<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nProject start year:<\/b>\u00a02014-2015<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nProject length:\u00a0<\/b>18 months<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nPartner organisations & countries:<\/b>\u00a0seven organisations (Slovakia, Georgia, Ukraine, Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nProject scope:<\/b>\u00a0The aim of the project is to provide information to citizens and local communities on local budget data and to enhance their abilities to influence public budgeting in capital cities of the participating countries. These goals shall be achieved by the development of six websites, which will provide simple, accurate and contextualized data on municipal budgets. Exchange of information on transparency, on policy priorities and on structure of local budgets may provide stimuli for more local participation and increased tax-awareness in these capitals.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nCollaboration \u2013 preliminary experiences and lessons:<\/b>\u00a0The cooperation and the composition of the group of applicants seemed to give ground to hopes of a truly successful project implementation. The project team is homogeneous enough regarding the professional motivations and backgrounds so that cultural differences would not pose a barrier to project progress. Diversity in the local contexts in terms of economic development, political and institutional background, however, has led to difficulties already in the first phase of the project. Due to political upheaval in the Ukraine, we have potentially lost not just one of our project partners, but probably also one of our co-financing sponsor.Funding poses further challenges due to the fact that the main sponsor has approved only a certain portion of the proposed budget. The project partners are now brainstorming on an alternative funding source, while still keeping an eye on the Ukrainian donor, who did not removed his offer. However, recent political events in Ukraine significantly slowed down the decision making process on their side.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\nConclusions<\/h2>\nIn our view, the cases above clearly demonstrate that:<\/p>\n \n- Multi-actor projects may be highly time-consuming, and<\/li>\n
- if dissemination and advocacy are as important as the research elements of a project, democratic rules and procedures in decision-making and involvement of local stakeholders in the implementation phase are crucial success criteria to the project.<\/li>\n
- Finally, political and economic instability can impede the implementation of an international initiative which is otherwise marked by the full commitment of the participating partner organisations.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This post was written in the framework of the On Think Tanks Exchange programme\u2019s (The Exchange)\u00a0barriers to collaboration project, it aims at structuring our ideas and insights related to the leading questions: Why policy research institutes do or do not collaborate? and What determines the success of their collaborations that do take place? Our approach […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"parent":2589,"menu_order":0,"template":"","tags":[354,353,816,204],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/initiative\/2606"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/initiative"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/initiative"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/initiative\/2606\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/initiative\/2589"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}} | | | | | | | | | | |