\n- Plenary presentations and debates were 45 minutes long and intended to give us \u201csomething to think about\u201d<\/li>\n
- Introductory presentations to the parallel sessions were 30 minutes long and intended to set the scene<\/li>\n
- Parallel sessions were 1h 30 minutes long<\/li>\n
- Extended coffee-breaks (30mins) and lunch-breaks (1h 30mins) to allow participants to engage with each other directly<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Day 1: 14th February<\/p>\n
\n- (900-930) Opening remarks and introductions<\/li>\n
- (930-1015) Key-note presentation and debate:\n
\n- Ruth Levine<\/b> (Hewlett Foundation) on the \u201cMoral case for evidence informed policy\u201d+<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- (1015-1045) Coffee-break<\/li>\n
- (1045-1115) Introductory presentation to the parallel sessions: Hans Gutbrod<\/strong><\/a> on authoritarian resurgence and how it might affect discussions on think tanks in populist contexts and credibility.+<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- (1115-1245) Parallel sessions A:\n
\n- Parallel session A1: \u201cWhat challenges do think tanks in populist and highly polarised contexts face and what roles can they play?\u201d with presentations by\u00a0Sonja Stojanovic Gajic<\/b> (BCSP),\u00a0Iulian Groza<\/b> (IPRE),\u00a0Simonida Kacarska<\/b><\/a> (EPI) and Christopher Rastrick<\/strong> (University of Western Ontario)+<\/span><\/span>\u00a0with commentaries from\u00a0Salvador Sanchez<\/strong>, Vice-Minister at the Ministry of the Presidency of Panam\u00e1<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- \n
\n- Parallel session A2: \u201cEnhancing the sustainability and effectiveness of think tanks in developing countries\u201d\u009d with\u00a0Barassou Diawara<\/b> and\u00a0Thomas Muthali<\/b> (ACBF), Giancarlo Roach<\/b> (Senacyt), and Julie LaFrance<\/strong> (Think Tank Initiative)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- \n
\n- Parallel session A3: \u201cThe Open Think Tank Directory: a new tool for think tanks and think tank scholars<\/a>\u201c led by Jeff Knezovich<\/b> (On Think Tanks) and Andrea Baertl<\/b> (On Think Tanks)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- (1245-1315) Report back<\/li>\n
- (1315-1445) Lunch<\/li>\n
- (1445-1530) Key-note presentation and debate\n
\n- Robert McLean\u00a0<\/b>(International Development Research Centre) on \u201cThe Science of Scalability<\/a>\u201d+<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- (1530-1700) Parallel sessions B:\n
\n- Parallel session B1: \u201cResearch credibility: how to gain it, how to maintain it, and how (not) to lose it\u201d with Andrea Baertl<\/b> <\/a>(On Think Tanks),\u00a0Jordan\u00a0Tchilingirian<\/a>\u00a0<\/b>(University of Bath) and Till Bruckner<\/b> (TranspariMED)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- \n
\n- Parallel session B2: \u201cDesign thinking for think tanks\u201d led by Melanie Rayment<\/b><\/a>+<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- \n
\n- Parallel session B3: \u201cWomen, knowledge and think tanks\u201d with Josephine Tsui\u00a0<\/strong><\/a>(ODI)\u00a0and Norma Correa\u00a0<\/strong>(PUCP)+<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- (1700-1730) Report back<\/li>\n
- (1730-1830) Tea and follow-up opportunity<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Day 2:<\/p>\n
\n- (900-930) Report back from Day 1<\/li>\n
- (930-1015) Key-note discussion: \u201cHow can think tanks be drivers of policy innovation?<\/a>\u201d a conversation with\u00a0Norma Correa<\/strong> (PUCP)<\/li>\n
- (1015-1045) Coffee-break<\/li>\n
- (1045-1115) Introductory presentation to the parallel sessions: \u201cNew think tanks in complex contexts: the case of Timor-Leste<\/a>\u201d by Stephen Yeo<\/strong> (OTT).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- (1115-1245) Parallel \u00a0sessions C:\n
\n- Parallel session C1: \u201cHow to measure the impact of think tanks?\u201d kickstarted by Donald Abelson<\/b> (The University of Western Ontario) with a commentary by\u00a0Enrique Planells-Artigot<\/strong><\/a> (ESIC Business & Marketing School) and Helen Tilley<\/strong>(ODI)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- \n
\n- Parallel session C2: \u201cGrassroots, city and regional think tanks: opportunities and challenges\u201d with\u00a0Ben Rogers<\/b>\u00a0and \u00a0Joanna Corfield<\/b> <\/a>(Centre for London)\u00a0and Luca Brunner<\/strong> <\/a>(global foraus)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- \n
\n- Parallel session C3: \u201cHow to move beyond financial transparency?<\/a>\u201d facilitated by Dustin\u00a0<\/b>Gilbreath\u00a0<\/b>(Transparify) and Hans Gutbrod <\/b>(Transparify)+<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- (1245-1315) Report back<\/li>\n
- (1315-1445) Lunch<\/li>\n
- (1445-1530) Show and engage sessions: This was an opportunity for participants to present ideas, projects or challenges and request advice from fellow participants.\n
\n- Show and engage session 1: \u201cWill think tanks change with a new emerging leadership? Lessons from the OTT Fellowship programme<\/a>\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0+<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- \n
\n- Show and engage session 2: \u201cA new digital dashboard to monitor policy engagement: Lessons from IFAD\u201d<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- \n
\n- Show and engage session 3: \u201cPlay Futures: how to develop a new field and achieve impact?<\/a>\u201d<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- (1530-1700)\u00a0Parallel sessions D:\n
\n- Parallel session D1: \u201cThe Future of think tank communications\u201d with John Schwartz<\/b><\/a> (Soapbox), Nicole Valentinuzzi<\/strong> <\/a>(Institute for Government) and Carolina Kern<\/b><\/a> (On Think Tanks)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- \n
\n- Parallel session D2: \u201cMobilising domestic funding for think tanks\u201d with\u00a0David Tripepi-Lewis <\/strong><\/a>(Institute for Government),\u00a0Ana Patricia Mu\u00f1oz<\/strong><\/a> (Grupo FARO) and Cristina Bacalso<\/strong> (Youth Policy Labs)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- (1700-1730) Tea-break<\/li>\n
- (1730-1800) Report back<\/li>\n
- (1800-1830) Presentation of the\u00a0OTT Annual Review<\/a>, closing remarks and discussion<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\nFriday, 16th\u00a0<\/sup>February: Academic meeting\u00a0<\/strong>(83 Pall Mall, London)<\/strong><\/h3>\nAs part of the OTT Conference week, the University of Bath\u2019s research network on think tanks and OTT , organised a post-conference meeting for think tank scholars.<\/p>\n
\n- (10:30-11:00) Introduction to the OTT\/Bath think tank and policy research network by Jordan Tchilingirian<\/strong> (University of Bath)<\/li>\n
- (11:00-11:20) New models of subjective well-being in cultural advocacy: a politics of research between the market and the academy by Susan Oman<\/strong> (University of Manchester)<\/li>\n
- (11:20-11:40) Gender and policy research careers by Norma Correa<\/strong> (PUCP)<\/li>\n
- (11:40-12:20) Think tanks and Trump, a conversation between Donald Abelson <\/strong>and Christopher Rastrick<\/strong> (University of Western Ontario)<\/li>\n
- (12:40-13:20) Lunch<\/li>\n
- (13:20-13:40) Understanding credibility by Andrea Baertl<\/strong> (On Think Tanks)<\/li>\n
- (13:40-14:00) British think tanks and the economic crisis, by Marcos Gonzalez Hernando<\/strong> (City University\/University of Cambridge)<\/li>\n
- (14:00-14:15) Break<\/li>\n
- (14:15-14:35) What can think tanks learn from alt-metrics, by Kate Williams\u00a0<\/strong>(University of Cambridge)<\/li>\n
- (14:35-15:00) Researching think tanks with digital methods and data sprints: warnings, opportunities and initial findings by Rebekah Larson<\/strong> (University of Cambridge), Susan Oman<\/strong> (University of Manchester) an Jordan Tchilingirian\u00a0<\/strong>(University of Bath)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\nAccounts from the participants<\/h2>\n
We asked those who attended to share some of their views on the conference. We registered some of their opinions about what went well -and not so well.<\/p>\n
This worked well:<\/p>\n
I liked the most an exchange on the issue of think tanks working in different contexts. I especially liked the keynote speeches of Hans Gutbord and Ruth Levine and the session on new types of think tanks\u00a0 from foraus<\/em> and Centre for London. I appreciated the chance to co-design the agenda through the online survey, along with the reading material and presentations from the conference. The long breaks were a great opportunity for networking!<\/p>\nThe format of the conference worked well. Participants were able to actively contribute to the discussion, and it was a balanced combination of presentations and working group discussions. The conference also offered a good networking opportunity for potential new partnerships. The organisation was perfect.<\/p>\n
Without a doubt it’s one of the best conferences I’ve ever attended. It was a pleasure and very rewarding at a personal and professional level.<\/p>\n
Really great presentations, networking was nice, but seeing everyone going through similar things in such diverse contexts was also interesting and reassuring.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n