{"id":681,"date":"2015-04-15T20:42:56","date_gmt":"2015-04-15T20:42:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/?p=681"},"modified":"2016-01-15T01:44:59","modified_gmt":"2016-01-15T01:44:59","slug":"think-tanks-and-universities-not-just-a-communications-partnership","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/articles\/think-tanks-and-universities-not-just-a-communications-partnership\/","title":{"rendered":"Think Tanks and Universities: not just a communications\u2019 partnership"},"content":{"rendered":"
Some time ago I wrote an article for the LSE\u2019s Impact of Social Sciences Blog in which I argued that\u00a0universities could collaborate with think tanks to enhance their capacity to communicate their theories and ideas<\/a>. Universities, I argued, are not always best places to turn\u00a0complex ideas into popular ones<\/a>. Think tanks, on the other hand, are supposed\u00a0to do this.<\/p>\n I was thinking of the British context when I wrote this. Or, at least, of a situation in which well-funded universities co-exist with well-funded think tanks and where both have the capacity to undertake research. In fact, the context I had in mind is one in which universities have a greater capacity to undertake research than think tanks.<\/p>\n But in a different context, there are other reasons why\u00a0universities and think tanks\u00a0<\/a>would want to work together. And one of these reasons provides an opportunity to explore a possible funding model for think tanks.<\/p>\n The context that I have in mind has some of the following characteristics:<\/p>\n Public Universities\u00a0\u00a0<\/a>only spent 14% of the S\/824.6 million (USD274 million)\u00a0they had for research in 2013.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n In summary, in a growing number of developing countries:<\/p>\n Over a long conversation, Orazio Bellettini,\u00a0director of Grupo FARO in Ecuador<\/a>, suggested that this opens the possibility for\u00a0a win-win situation. We just need to find the mechanisms to make it happen. Luckily, there\u00a0is a well known case from the\u00a0UK that could serve as inspiration: IDS.\u00a0Hans Gutbrod offers a very similar argument in a post he wrote on the CRRC\u2019s experience<\/a>.<\/p>\n [Editor\u2019s note: I should note that I am not trying to describe the IDS model in detail. I am using it to encourage a discussion of the possibility for a new form of think tank \u2013 university partnership.]<\/em><\/p>\n The\u00a0Institute of Development Studies<\/a>\u00a0(IDS) was founded as an independent research institute based at the\u00a0University of Sussex<\/a>, but it does not belong to the university.\u00a0IDS has close links with the University, but is financially and constitutionally independent.\u00a0It is, in fact, registered in England as a charitable company (no.\u00a000877338<\/a>) limited by guarantee, and with registered charity number\u00a0306371<\/a>.<\/p>\n This\u00a0hosting<\/em>\u00a0takes the shape of a contract between both institutions. IDS pays a \u2018fee\u2019 to the University of Sussex for its use of its building, university services, and other benefits. A straight forward contractual arrangement that works well for both.<\/p>\n IDS\u2019s original mission\u00a0included both research and teaching so the relationship with the university allowed it to obtain accreditation for its teaching programmes. At the same time, the university gained a new centre and teaching programme -which at the time was not something one could find any where else in the UK.<\/p>\n Some characteristics\u00a0of this relationship, from IDS\u2019 point of view, include:<\/p>\n Is this the best model for a think tank in a developing country?\u00a0Well, it is a start.<\/p>\n The IDS model is different to what I had in mind in terms of funding. The win-win situation we are referring too implies that universities would have to fund the think tanks to do research -at least a significant proportion of its long term research agenda. In the case of IDS its largest five donors in 2013\/14 were:<\/p>\n So, in this case, the university is not a key funder. But in our model, and in contexts where universities are well funded but lack the capacity to undertake research themselves, we could expect a significant proportion of funding for research to come from the university itself. Some of those USD274 million in the case of Peru could make a huge difference for more than a few think tanks in the country and, why not, the region.<\/p>\n This last point is important. This model should work with foreign think tanks, too. Cash-rich universities wanting to leap-frog to the international leagues could very well attract global think tanks to set-up shop within their campuses -physically or virtually.<\/p>\n Therefore, the new model proposed could involve:<\/p>\n Making this happen will take more than lawyers (but they\u00a0will be necessary). It will demand a charm offensive and the development of long term partnerships. \u00a0A possible road-map could include:<\/p>\n These may involve some costs that think tanks and their funders should be willing to accept. The pay-off is likely to make up for it.<\/p>\n They may also demand change to universities\u2019 own mandates and rules and in the case of public universities, it could involve national educational policy changes, too.<\/p>\n Who better than think tanks to advocate for them?<\/p>\n Do you know of a similar model? Please write to us below and let us know its pros and cons.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Think tanks and universities can work together to maximise the impact of the latter’s research. They may also undertake research together and can provide interesting career paths for their own staff. But think tanks and universities can also come together in a win-win funding for research partnership. This post takes inspiration from IDS’ model in the UK to suggest a model of collaboration relevant for some developing countries.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","footnotes":""},"tags":[220,182,204,193,187],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/681"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=681"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/681\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n
\n
The Institute of\u00a0Development Studies as a model?<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
A new win-win model<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n