{"id":723,"date":"2015-02-26T22:17:35","date_gmt":"2015-02-26T22:17:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/?p=723"},"modified":"2016-01-15T18:02:46","modified_gmt":"2016-01-15T18:02:46","slug":"addressing-think-tank-transparency-one-of-the-elephants-in-the-room","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/articles\/addressing-think-tank-transparency-one-of-the-elephants-in-the-room\/","title":{"rendered":"Addressing think tank transparency: one of the elephants in the room"},"content":{"rendered":"
It was probably a bit unfair to suggest that the\u00a0#TTIX2015 was not going to address transparency<\/a>. On the last day, a group of think tanks from the UK, Latin America, Africa and Eastern Europe (as well as funders from Eastern Europe and Africa) got together to talk about think tank transparency.<\/p>\n https:\/\/twitter.com\/andrejnosko\/status\/568710741638799360\/photo\/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Only a few days earlier,\u00a0Transparify had published its second annual report<\/a>. Several think tanks present had been rated (some with rather encouraging results).<\/p>\n The discussion centred on 5 key issues:<\/p>\n It would be unfair to suggest that think tanks who do not publish all their financial\u00a0information are trying to hide something. The group identified four\u00a0main reasons for not being transparent and each requires to be addressed on their own merits:<\/p>\n Among the reasons to be transparent we could identify the following 3 broad categories:<\/p>\n Of course, transparency can be a means and an end.<\/p>\n Transparify has focused on financial transparency but there are other aspects of the think tank that we ought to know about (there may be others):<\/p>\n It may be worth noting, as Sonja Stojanovic reminded me on a comment to this blog post, transparency is not the same as accountability. But it is a good step in the right direction.<\/p>\n This, of course, depends on 1) the reasons they have for being or not being transparent and 2) the definition of transparency we use -because this will have a big effect on, 3) their capacity to be transparent.<\/p>\n In any case, one thing that think tanks can do is to start a conversation about these issues. This is the best way for them to take the initiative and own the reforms that will be expected of many of them. So, to focus on:<\/p>\n\n
Reasons for not being transparent<\/h2>\n
\n
Reasons for\u00a0being transparent<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
What do we mean by transparency?<\/h2>\n
\n
What can think tanks do about it?<\/h2>\n
\n\n
\n Reason<\/strong><\/td>\n Narrow ($)<\/strong><\/td>\n Holistic<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Privacy<\/strong><\/td>\n \u00a0They could seek to include, among\u00a0their funders, those who do not want to remain private.They could also attempt to explain this argument more clearly in their own sites and reports.<\/td>\n They could make a greater effort on the other categories.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Security<\/strong><\/td>\n \u00a0They could consider transparency as a tactic to avoid attacks based on their funding sources -if it is all public then they have nothing to hide. But they could choose to limit\u00a0information that could put individual researchers at risk.<\/td>\n Explaining their board make up, their own work, the researchers\u2019 backgrounds, publishing data, etc. they could draw attention away from financial transparency.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Capacity<\/strong><\/td>\n \u00a0Improvements in communication would go a long way<\/td>\n \u00a0Improvements in communication would go a long way<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Credibility<\/strong><\/td>\n Establish and publish clear policies or rules related to how much they can accept from certain funders (or sectors), or publish the Terms of Reference of the contracts to show that the think tank retains its right to publish, etc.<\/td>\n All of the above<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n \n
What can funders do about it?<\/h2>\n