Skip to content

The Renaissance of the Corporate Website


[Editor's note: This post has been written by Mallory Clyne, Communications Manager at The North-South Institute. It is in response to a post by James Georgalakis that in turn followed a post by Nick Scott on whether corporate websites were on their way out or not. The discussion, including  Suzanne Fisher Murray's post on IIED’s own website redesign, is summarised in this post: Corporate websites: do we need them?]

Recently, many international development think tanks have revised their websites making them more accessible, simple and visually attractive. When I joined The North-South Institute as Communications Manager, I too insisted on a complete overhaul of the website, but why?

In an age of financial austerity and increased competition for scarce funding, a think tank’s website is more important than ever. For many of us, the days of flying to faraway lands for fieldwork or attending global conferences, are gone.  These days, even the price of printing and bulk mailing can deter a think tank from disseminating its work. A corporate website is the saving-grace for the cash-strapped think tank that has valuable things to say, but limited funds to say it. Your website is not only a repository for your work but also, your ambassador. It can go places your organization can’t afford to, it can disseminate your findings to audiences you could never dream of reaching and if it is attractive, interesting and accessible enough, it can garner trust from a potential funder or future partner.

Some would argue that in a world that is increasingly directed by social media, why bother with the corporate website? Today, ‘hashtag’ categories allow you to search a word, and 140 characters direct you to a ‘bitly’ that drives you directly to an article which has the information you need.  Social media has changed the landscape of news and removed the emphasis from who wrote the content to the content itself. When it comes to what’s getting read, the ‘like’ and ‘share’ can trump the author or the institute’s credentials. And when getting read is the raison d’être of a think tank, one might argue that think tanks should aggressively engage with social media -but does a think tank really need a  Pinterest account?

Although social media can offer you exponentially larger reach than your electronic mailing list or your corporate website, problems abound. Social media has a reputation. It can be an amazing network for sharing information but it comes at a price. Robot spammers on Twitter, Facebook selling fake likes to well-intentioned small businesses (think tanks included), privacy violations and increased commercialization lend social media a reputation of inauthenticity. When it comes to the valuable work of think tanks, ensuring that your research is seen as authentic, authoritative and trustworthy is necessary for securing readership and guaranteeing impact.  Overreliance on social networks is a mistake.

Beyond the issue of trust, or the fact that an older audience (often a think tank’s demographic) can be turned off by social media, the very abundance that makes social media so attractive, is the thing that can deter people from it.

A corporate website, if structured properly, can offer you a search function that social media platforms will not.  It can provide you with richness of information, depth and easy access that an over-abundant social media cannot. When you come to a corporate website, you are guaranteed that what you are reading has been institutionally endorsed and was written by an employed and trusted leader or expert in their field. A corporate website also offers a global view of the opinions and values an organization stands for, and not just the opinion of one lone 750 word blog.

As an example, an intern at a think tank published an op-ed in a popular blog without the approval of the think tank he was interning for. The views did not reflect those of the think tank. The byline on the op-ed listed him as a researcher at the think tank. Because the blog is popular, his work appears before some of the think tank’s major works in Google -so what’s a Communications Manager to do?

The trick to curing the postmodern blues, as always, is balance. As we venture further into new media and as information exponentially abounds, the importance of authenticity and access increases. The corporate website is not in decline, but in its renaissance. Most think tanks are integrating social media into their websites and de-bunking their content considerably. Ease of access and high focus on visuals are the trend and with the arrival of Google Analytics, the corporate website has shifted its focus from itself onto its audience. Social media, if anything, has increased the importance of the corporate website and will continue to do so as it proliferates into newfangled forms on a minutely basis. Social media will always be the place I go to watch cats playing patty cake, but when it comes to hard research on global issues, I will look to reputable publications, well-known think tanks’ websites and Google Alerts.

About these ads
One Comment Post a comment
  1. Nick Scott #

    Great article. There are lots of points I agree with here.

    I do have some concerns, however, that the challenge to corporate websites is outlined as social media only. If this is the choice, then clearly corporate websites hold their own and offer value. But this is a false choice.

    There are a whole range of social sites that are not what we consider social media, and they are in many cases the real challenge to corporate websites. A couple of examples:
    – For research information, studies have found Wikipedia is more accurate often than Encyclopaedia Britannica. Wikipedia offers information from multiple credible sources, not just one. Where it offers this information in a well-written article, there is a clear challenge for the corporate website of a single research organisation that could never have the breadth of offer that Wikipedia does.
    – Professional (as opposed to social) profiles – like those found on LinkedIn or Google Scholar profiles – offer more information on a researcher than a corporate website often does. Many think tank sites, including ODI’s, list information about the work of the researcher while at the think tank, not giving the prominence to the detail of all their past work.

    I think the power of an argument around the declining importance of corporate websites is that it challenges the established view that the website is the predominant channel for online communication. This view is still very much present in the think tank/research world: just look at how many Website Managers are being hired and compare to the Online and Digital Managers I see corporates increasingly hiring. Without strong challenges, like those I try to make when talking about the demise of corporate websites, organisations are easily left behind. Yes, a corporate website is essential now, perhaps it is in its renaissance, but falls in the technology world can often come quicker than anyone expects. Just ask MySpace.


    January 15, 2013

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,168 other followers

%d bloggers like this: